The Evolving Role of L&D Leaders in the Future of Workplace Learning
The future of workplace learning is
already here, and it’s not just about new content or cutting-edge digital
platforms. Employees have transformed how they learn on the job, with many
seeking solutions on their own rather than relying on learning and development
departments. That isn’t to say that the L&D department is no longer
relevant. It does, however, imply that it will most likely need to change.
But how do you do it? L&D is becoming
increasingly digital for every learning leader. As a result, practically anyone
can now learn almost whatever they need, whenever they choose, on their own.
What isn’t evident is how learning and development teams should adjust to this
new reality. To address such a question, we must first comprehend how today’s
workers develop their talents. These individuals operate at all levels of
organizations, in large and small businesses, in various industries and job
types.
So,
today, let’s address this critical question: What is the Evolving Role of
L&D Leaders in the Future of Workplace Learning?
Evolving
Role of L&D Leaders in the Future of Workplace Learning
People’s investment in an on-demand economy
Most CEOs do not invest in people out of altruism or
social conscience. Management invests in workplace training to increase
productivity and performance. Chief executives get compensated primarily for
delivering value to shareholders, which one derives mainly from increased
earnings.
So what if employees are dissatisfied with their
training? Because learning and development are among the most potent tools
businesses have to boost productivity, research shows that employee engagement
predicts future financial success.
People
are a high cost, accounting for a considerable part of the operating costs in
many firms. As a result, we talk about human capital management more than we
talk about investing in people. In recent years, employers have contributed a
significant section of the payroll and into the contingent workforce as a
continuous efficiency drive.
Freelancers, contractors, and temp workers are also
on the rise. A growing number of firms are using contract and temporary (“gig”)
employees. Employees value the flexibility and independence of contract jobs
above the typical structure of a steady 9-to-5 job in the gig economy, which
signals a shift in how they view work. Organizations are grappling with how to
train these new types of workers, who may not have access to typical employee
systems like learning portals, as the gig economy grows.
When
it comes to achieving optimal performance for the organization, the L&D
function must think outside the enterprise. As the nature of work changes,
L&D is adapting by providing learning opportunities for employees that go
beyond standard corporate
training.
Again,
when it comes to individuals in the on-demand economy, efficiency takes
precedence over engagement.
This
push for efficiency has altered L&D as well. Corporate training is
increasingly given through technology to increase reach, reduce expenses, and
improve consistency rather than satisfy the unique demands of Generation X,
Millennials, or the Homeland Generation (those born after the mid-1990s).
Investing in efficiency alone, on the other hand,
isn’t enough for today’s workers. The desire for efficiency, on the other hand,
isn’t going away. As a result, traditional trade tools such as instructional
design, facilitation, open source learning
management systems (LMS), e-learning courses, virtual classes, and fast
authoring tools are still helpful. They’re simply unfinished. In addition to
efficiency, tools must handle engagement.
Conclusion
Rebuilding
Learning and Development (L&D) for the digital age and democracy
Getting
and keeping employees involved in their work is more important than ever, and
L&D is critical to accomplishing this. However, the methods by which we
train and develop workers must change.
Leaders
in learning and development recognize the need to change. They’re rethinking their
corporate learning practices to engage
today’s workforce better. Many are investing in new technology or more modern
content. Fewer, on the other hand, are reorganizing, reskilling, and recruiting
for new talents within their own teams.
Comments
Post a Comment